Telehealth Interoperability in Behavioral Health

Telehealth has transformed behavioral health care, with 80% of mental health facilities now offering virtual services.

However, the lack of interoperability - systems that seamlessly share patient data - hinders its full potential.

Interoperability connects providers, platforms, and care settings, enabling better patient outcomes, reduced costs, and improved workflows. Key developments include:

Telehealth Types: Real-time sessions, secure messaging, and remote monitoring tools.

Interoperability Standards: U.S. policies like the 21st Century Cures Act, TEFCA, and data frameworks like USCDI ensure secure, standardized data sharing.

Technology: FHIR-based APIs, SMART on FHIR apps, and AI tools enhance real-time communication between systems.

Challenges: Privacy regulations (e.g., 42 CFR Part 2), technical barriers, and digital access disparities still pose hurdles.

Interoperability is reshaping workflows by simplifying referrals, improving medication management, and integrating lab results into telehealth platforms. By adopting interoperable systems, providers can deliver connected, patient-centered care while addressing gaps in access and equity.

Evolution of USCDI Standards for Behavioral Health Data Interoperability

Telehealth interoperability relies on a shared data language to ensure smooth communication between providers, patients, and platforms.

In the United States, specific standards, policies, and technologies have been established to safeguard the secure exchange of behavioral health information. These frameworks regulate how data is formatted, accessed, and used, forming the backbone of efficient telehealth systems and supporting better clinical workflows and data management.

U.S. Policies and Regulatory Frameworks

The 21st Century Cures Act brought significant changes to how behavioral health data is exchanged. It specifically prohibits information blocking, which refers to any practice that hinders the access, exchange, or use of electronic health information. Since October 6, 2022, the definition of electronic health information (EHI) has expanded to include all electronic protected health information that patients are entitled to access under HIPAA. Health IT developers were required to enable EHI export capabilities for providers by December 31, 2023^[7].

"RXNT will now allow patients to select specific information from their health record and send it securely to external platforms." - Coleman Young, Product Manager for Electronic Health Records, RXNT^[7]

The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) sets a universal governance structure for nationwide interoperability.

In December 2025, RXNT partnered with Kno2 to provide integrated access to TEFCA, allowing users to connect to Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs). This partnership simplifies the exchange of behavioral health data across various care settings by eliminating the need for individual agreements with multiple organizations^[7].

42 CFR Part 2 introduces stricter confidentiality rules for substance use disorder (SUD) patient records. Unlike HIPAA, which offers general privacy protections, Part 2 requires explicit patient consent before SUD information can be shared through Health Information Exchanges. As a result, consent management becomes a critical feature for any telehealth platform aiming for interoperability^[3].

Behavioral Health Data Standards

The United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) specifies the minimum data set needed for nationwide health information exchange.

This framework ensures consistent formatting of behavioral health data across electronic health records (EHRs) and telehealth platforms. Over time, USCDI has expanded to better address behavioral health needs:

The addition of "Alcohol Use" and "Substance Use" tracking in USCDI Version 4 was a major milestone for addiction treatment providers. These standardized data elements enable telehealth platforms to document and share critical information about a patient's substance use history, treatment progress, and recovery goals in a format compatible with certified EHRs^[5].

Technologies and Messaging Standards

HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) is the cornerstone of modern healthcare data exchange. By leveraging web technologies like HTTP requests and JSON formatting, FHIR allows platforms to request specific data - such as a patient's current medications or recent lab results - without needing to download an entire medical record^[10].

"FHIR provides a means for representing and sharing information among clinicians and organizations in a standard way regardless of the ways local EHRs represent or store the data." - eCQI Resource Center^[9]

RESTful APIs built on FHIR facilitate real-time communication between telehealth systems, EHRs, and insurance networks. U.S. hospitals have made significant progress in interoperability, with 62% now capable of sending, receiving, finding, and integrating data - up from 40% in 2017^[10]. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has set deadlines for implementing FHIR-based APIs: January 1, 2026, for impacted payers and January 1, 2027, for Prior Authorization APIs. These APIs will enable electronic requests and decisions within 72 hours for expedited cases, further streamlining clinical workflows^[10].

SMART on FHIR takes interoperability a step further by allowing third-party applications, such as telehealth platforms or patient-facing apps, to integrate seamlessly with EHR systems. This capability lets therapists access patient data directly within their workflows. For behavioral health organizations, ensuring a vendor's FHIR readiness is crucial, as implementation can be a multi-year process requiring considerable technical resources^[6].

How Interoperability Improves Behavioral Telehealth Workflows

Interoperability is reshaping telehealth workflows in behavioral health by enabling seamless data exchange and coordination across systems. It elevates telehealth from a simple video call to a comprehensive care experience, where clinicians can focus on delivering care rather than hunting for information. This transformation impacts three key areas: patient access, clinical sessions, and medication management.

Patient Access and Engagement

Interoperable systems streamline the referral process, eliminating the need for manual record transfers. For example, when a primary care physician refers a patient to a behavioral health specialist, medical history, current medications, and treatment notes can be automatically shared. This ensures the specialist has all necessary information before the first telehealth session.

Unified patient portals further enhance access by providing 24/7 availability of mental health records, treatment plans, and communication tools in one place. These portals simplify administrative tasks like registration and pre-visit paperwork, allowing virtual sessions to focus entirely on care. Research highlights that these tools significantly improve patient satisfaction, as they reduce unnecessary hurdles.

However, when systems lack proper integration, patients often face fragmented care - missing medical history, redundant forms, or repeated tests due to inaccessible records. Alarmingly, only 44% of clinicians report that their EHRs meet integration expectations^[12]. For behavioral health patients, who may already feel hesitant about seeking help, these barriers can discourage them from continuing treatment.

AI-powered contact centers add another layer of accessibility. Using natural language processing, these systems allow patients to schedule appointments, request referrals, or ask questions at any time. This is especially critical in behavioral health, as crises often arise outside standard office hours. For instance, rural Medicare beneficiaries saw a 425% rise in tele-mental health services between 2010 and 2017^[11]. These tools ensure patients receive timely support, setting the stage for more effective virtual care.

Clinical Workflows During Virtual Visits

Interoperability transforms clinical workflows during telehealth sessions by providing instant access to essential patient information, such as medical history, medications, allergies, and lab results. This real-time access is particularly crucial in behavioral health, where a comprehensive understanding of a patient's medication regimen is vital for safe and effective treatment planning.

Integrated registries further enhance care coordination. For instance, if a psychiatrist adjusts a patient’s medication during a telehealth session, the update is immediately reflected in the primary care physician's EHR. This reduces the risk of drug interactions or redundant prescriptions and ensures all providers remain on the same page.

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) tools also play a significant role. Devices that track metrics like sleep patterns, heart rate, or substance use can send data directly to the EHR. These systems can trigger alerts for care teams if a patient’s data indicates a potential crisis or relapse. For example, a Bluetooth-enabled breathalyzer used by a patient in recovery can notify the care team of concerning readings, enabling early intervention without requiring an in-person visit.

Despite the benefits, there’s a gap in adoption - while 80% of mental health facilities offer telehealth services^[1], only about 30% of providers have achieved full EHR interoperability^[12]. This lack of integration often forces clinicians to spend session time on administrative tasks instead of focusing on therapy, highlighting the need for better-connected systems.

E-Prescribing and Laboratory Integration

Interoperable systems simplify medication management by enabling electronic prescribing for treatments like psychotropics, antidepressants, and medications for substance use disorders, such as buprenorphine for medication-assisted treatment (MAT)^[2]. Tools like smart pill boxes or bio-ingestible sensors can track medication adherence, sending reminders to patients and alerts to providers if issues arise.

Laboratory integration is another critical component. Patients can use at-home kits, such as oral swabs or blood collection devices, for substance use testing. Results are transmitted directly into their records, and virtual supervision via video ensures the integrity of sample collection, addressing concerns like chain of custody^[2].

Clinical decision support tools embedded in prescribing workflows provide real-time guidance. These systems automatically check for contraindications or other safety concerns based on the patient’s medical history, ensuring medications are prescribed safely during telehealth visits.

Platforms like Opus Behavioral Health EHR integrate e-prescribing and lab functions directly into the workflow, allowing providers to manage prescriptions, order tests, and review results without switching between systems. This streamlined approach reduces errors and ensures that care decisions are based on the most up-to-date information available.

Challenges and Solutions in Telehealth Interoperability

Expanding on the discussion of interoperability standards and workflow improvements, this section dives into the hurdles and practical ways to overcome them in implementing interoperable telehealth systems. While the advantages of such systems are clear, behavioral health providers face significant challenges, including navigating strict privacy rules, overcoming technical hurdles, and addressing equity gaps in access to care.

Privacy and Consent Management

Handling patient consent in behavioral health telehealth is particularly tricky due to overlapping federal regulations. The 2024 Final Rule for 42 CFR Part 2 marks a major shift by aligning substance use disorder (SUD) record protections with HIPAA. This change allows a single consent for all future uses and disclosures related to treatment, payment, and healthcare operations, simplifying what was once a fragmented process. Providers have until February 2026 to meet the updated requirements.

The challenge, however, is managing granular consent when patients want to control access to specific parts of their records. Most older EHR systems don’t have the capability to tag sensitive data. One way to address this is through Data Segmentation for Privacy (DS4P) initiatives, which use metadata tagging to flag SUD records at a detailed level. For example, EHRs can mark certain diagnostic codes as sensitive to prevent accidental disclosure. For systems that can’t yet handle this, temporary solutions like parallel repositories or external encryption tools can secure sensitive data until upgrades are made.

SUD counseling notes, which require separate consent, add another layer of complexity. Tools like SAMHSA's Consent2Share (C2S) help by providing a patient-friendly platform for managing these consent preferences directly within workflows for EHRs and Health Information Exchanges (HIEs).

To ensure comprehensive data security, integrating these privacy measures into technical workflows is essential.

Technical and Workflow Barriers

Behavioral health providers often trail behind general medical settings in adopting EHR systems, creating a gap in infrastructure that hampers data sharing. This is further complicated by inconsistent data standards and limited investment in interoperability technology, making smooth communication between behavioral health and primary care providers difficult.

When telehealth platforms don’t integrate well with existing clinical documentation systems, they can unintentionally add to the workload for care teams instead of streamlining it. For instance, increased screen time can lead to telehealth fatigue, emphasizing the need for ergonomic setups and efficient visit protocols. While 80% of mental health treatment facilities now offer telehealth services, achieving seamless interoperability remains a work in progress.

Regulatory complexities add to these challenges. The Ryan Haight Act, for example, generally requires providers prescribing controlled substances via telehealth to conduct at least one in-person medical exam every 24 months. Exceptions exist for medication-assisted treatment (MAT) providers, but varying state licensing rules and credentialing requirements further complicate multi-state telehealth services.

To tackle these barriers, organizations can join state or regional HIEs to enable bidirectional data sharing across care settings. Another approach is adopting credentialing-by-proxy processes to streamline the verification of remote practitioners’ qualifications. Platforms like Opus Behavioral Health EHR address these challenges by integrating telehealth with clinical documentation, e-prescribing, and lab functions, reducing the need to juggle multiple systems and cutting down on administrative burdens.

Overcoming these technical challenges is critical for ensuring fair and effective care delivery.

Equity and the Digital Divide

In addition to privacy and technical issues, equitable access to telehealth poses another significant challenge. Disparities in broadband access, device availability, and digital literacy can leave vulnerable patients - those who stand to benefit most from telehealth - unable to access virtual care.

Standardized frameworks like TEFCA and updated USCDI elements are helping to identify and address these gaps. These shared standards are especially important for smaller behavioral health providers that may lack the resources to develop their own IT solutions. Shared infrastructure and cloud-based systems can help these organizations overcome cost and complexity hurdles.

"The use of telehealth for behavioral health care may increase access, continuity of care, patient privacy, and convenience while reducing barriers to care, including fears of stigma." - HHS ^[1]

Practical steps to bridge the digital divide include using tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale to assess patients’ digital health literacy. Providers can also incorporate digital literacy training into their workflows or offer resources to help patients prepare for telebehavioral health visits. Additionally, the ONC Health IT Playbook and behavioral health-specific educational modules provide valuable guidance for organizations transitioning to interoperable systems.

Building an Interoperable Telehealth Ecosystem

Transforming telehealth challenges into actionable steps can lead to smoother, more effective healthcare delivery. Here's a practical roadmap for achieving interoperability in telehealth, particularly for behavioral health providers.

Implementation Roadmap for Behavioral Health Providers

Start by evaluating your current workflows to identify inefficiencies. As Michael Arevalo, Psy.D., PMP at Core Solutions, explains:

"Selecting the right behavioral health EHR starts with assessing your needs and identifying which systems, processes, and/or workflows need an upgrade" ^[13].

Signs of inefficiency might include clinicians bypassing the EHR, delays in assessing client risk levels, or a lack of AI support for diagnoses. The disparity in EHR adoption is stark: only 6% of mental health facilities and 29% of substance use disorder centers use EHRs, compared to nearly 80% of office-based physicians ^[13]. This gap creates hurdles in data sharing with primary care providers and hospitals.

To bridge these gaps, adopt a "walk, crawl, run" approach - start with basic functionalities and expand as staff become more comfortable ^[13]. Successful implementation hinges on staff engagement. Identify internal champions to advocate for the new system and provide peer support, which is crucial given that 62% of behavioral healthcare providers report moderate to severe burnout ^[13].

Data consistency is critical. During migration, ensure coding and security gaps are addressed, as inconsistent data can lead to new silos and vulnerabilities. In 2023 alone, over 112 million individuals in the U.S. were affected by healthcare data breaches ^[4]. Plan for rigorous data quality checks and maintain robust security measures throughout the process.

Features of Interoperable Behavioral Health EHR Platforms

When selecting an EHR platform, focus on telehealth integration, open APIs, and FHIR support. Platforms with built-in telehealth functionality eliminate the frustration of switching between systems, improving clinician satisfaction and appointment timeliness ^[13]. Look for features such as HIPAA-compliant video conferencing, virtual waiting rooms, and seamless visit launches from the clinical workflow.

The platform should support open APIs and FHIR for secure, real-time data exchange with hospitals, labs, and primary care providers. As Logan Masta, Director of Special Projects at Arcadia, emphasizes:

"The core objective of EHR management is to provide whole-person care. Millions of data points can create positive, individual health outcomes when connected" ^[4].

AI-powered NLP tools are another key feature, streamlining documentation and suggesting diagnoses to ease clinician workloads ^[13]. Automated revenue cycle management (RCM) tools should handle complex billing codes, verify insurance eligibility in real-time, and manage telehealth-specific modifiers like -95 or GT to reduce claim denials ^[13].

For tracking clinical outcomes, measurement-based care (MBC) dashboards are indispensable. These tools use validated instruments like PHQ-9, GAD-7, and C-SSRS with automated scoring to monitor health status changes ^[13]. Substance use disorder programs should also prioritize platforms with 42 CFR Part 2 tools to manage consent and privacy requirements beyond standard HIPAA protections ^[3].

One example is Opus Behavioral Health EHR, which integrates telehealth, clinical documentation, e-prescribing, lab functions, and AI tools into one platform. It offers customizable workflows, outcome measurement tools, and over 140 reporting options tailored for addiction and behavioral health centers, eliminating the need for multiple systems.

Data Governance and Compliance

Once an interoperable EHR platform is in place, robust data governance becomes essential. This includes not only security but also data stewardship, quality measurement, and regulatory compliance. All Protected Health Information (PHI) must be encrypted, and video communication technologies must meet HIPAA standards ^[2].

For substance use disorder programs, 42 CFR Part 2 compliance requires written patient consent before sharing treatment information, even within health information exchanges ^{[3] [2]}. Tools that support granular consent management can help navigate the complex web of federal and state privacy laws. Staff should be trained using official SAMHSA and ONC educational resources on these provisions ^[3].

Aligning with United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) standards, particularly the latest versions like V5, ensures that data elements such as "Mental/Cognitive Status" and "Clinical Notes" are exchanged using nationwide standards ^[18]. This is especially important for smaller providers with limited IT resources.

Finally, compliance with prescribing regulations is a must. The Ryan Haight Act mandates that providers prescribing controlled substances via telehealth conduct an in-person exam at least once every 24 months, with specific DEA exceptions ^[2]. Ensure malpractice insurance covers telehealth services across states where patients are located, and consider "credentialing-by-proxy" to streamline verification of remote practitioners' qualifications ^[2].

With the electronic health records market expected to grow to $39.38 billion by 2032 ^[4], investing in the right interoperable platform now positions your organization to thrive in a more connected healthcare landscape.

Conclusion

Interoperability transforms a simple video consultation into a gateway for comprehensive care. When behavioral health providers can seamlessly share data with primary care physicians, labs, and pharmacies, patients benefit from coordinated treatment that addresses both mental and physical health concerns. This approach is especially vital for the nearly 22 million adults in the U.S. living with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders ^[13].

The urgency for better data exchange becomes clear when looking at current inefficiencies. While telehealth adoption has surged, only 6% of mental health facilities use interoperable electronic health records. This lack of integration forces clinicians to spend valuable time manually transferring files instead of focusing on patient care. The result? Increased burnout among behavioral health providers. On the other hand, organizations leveraging integrated technology stacks empower their teams to focus on clinical improvements rather than administrative burdens.

Adopting platforms that support open APIs, FHIR standards, and comply with HIPAA and 42 CFR Part 2 is critical for creating a connected care environment. Universal digital screening tools can also help bridge the digital divide. By addressing challenges like data security, technical integration, and equitable access, providers can build a stronger, more resilient telehealth ecosystem. As Logan Masta, Director of Special Projects at Arcadia, puts it:

"The core objective of EHR management is to provide whole-person care. Millions of data points can create positive, individual health outcomes when connected" ^[4].

The push for interoperability is backed by market trends. The electronic health records market is expected to hit $39.38 billion by 2032 ^[4], highlighting the growing momentum. By investing in integrated systems now, providers can improve patient outcomes, cut costs, and streamline workflows. This is a critical step toward addressing the treatment gap, as 77% of individuals with substance use disorders currently go without care ^[13]. Solutions like Opus Behavioral Health EHR are already paving the way by simplifying data exchange and improving care coordination.

For behavioral health providers, interoperability isn’t just a technical upgrade - it’s the cornerstone of delivering patient-centered care that meets the complex needs of individuals, providers, and communities across the U.S.

FAQs